Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Foster Carers
Sponsored by
Disgleiriwch - Rydym Angen Gofalwyr Maeth 0800 7830618
 
 
Sunday, 20th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Does this picture show a ghost at Chirk Castle? HAVE YOUR SAY



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

AN AMATEUR photographer from Cheshire got the shock of his life when he spotted a ghost-like figure in a photo he took at Chirk Castle.
The black and white photograph was taken by Farndon resident, Grant Scott during a visit to Chirk Castle last week.

When he downloaded the picture, taken in the courtyard of Chirk Castle on a digital camera, Grant was very surprised to find what appears to be a female figure dressed in clothes from the early 1900s standing in the background of the shot.

Grant, an environmental planner who enjoys photography as a hobby, explained that he had been to Chirk Castle on a day out and cannot recall seeing a woman standing there at any point.

He said: "It was late morning, getting on for lunchtime. I'd been on a photography course so I was fiddling about with shutter speeds. It didn't really work but I kept a couple on the camera to see if I could rescue them when I got home. I was looking at this particular one and I noticed this figure in the background."

Puzzled by the photograph, Grant took it to show his course tutor to see if he could shed any light on it.

Grant said: "It's strange because in all the others anyone who was moving has come out blurred or if they were standing still, they were clear like the man in the photo.

"At no time do I remember seeing a woman dressed like that."

Grant mentioned the photo to a friend who took a copy to show a clairvoyant he knows who apparently had some success.

The clairvoyant suggested a name, date and profession for the woman – Martha Bell, 1880-1900, schoolmistress or nanny.

Evening Leader picture editor Rick Matthews gave his professional opinion on the snap and agreed that the appearance of the figure is odd. He said: "It's unusual. If he was experimenting with shutter speeds in a long exposure anyone standing still would come out clear but anyone moving would be blurred. This figure still has some translucency which is hard to explain."

Howard Hughes, director of Wrexham-based paranormal group Spiritquest UK, said: "I think it warrants further investigation for a real conclusion and given time I could examine it in more detail, but in my opinion I would say that it is genuine.

"It appears to be a long exposure photograph. If you look at the figure, you can clearly see a white streak which runs from the figure of the woman to the doorway. It does not seem to pass in front of the man which suggests that the woman moved from the doorway, behind the man to where she is standing during the exposure.

"This I think discounts the possibility of digital fakery. I think this also eliminates the possibility of a double exposure and of course the woman definitely has a different visual quality and dimension to the man and indeed the rest of the picture.

Jill Burton, education officer at the castle, also admitted that the photo is strange but offered an explanation that the figure does bear a resemblance to a woman who often attends lectures at the castle.

She said: "The door on the left is the entrance to the chapel, the door on the right is the disabled toilet – the woman looks like she is queuing for the toilet.

She continued: "The castle has been lived in for 700 years so, like any building of that age, there are noises, creaks and shadows. For those of us who live there we believe that if there are any impressions of the past then they are friendly ones."

CLICK HERE to see the ghostly picture in high quality

Is this a ghost?

Have your say by leaving a comment below and taking part in our online poll at the side of this page.

If you've taken any ghostly pictures and would like to share them with us you can email them to digitalnews@nwn.co.uk



The full article contains 684 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 May 2008 11:02 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Wrexham
 
Prev
1
Next
1

glorybe,

wrexham 22/05/2008 17:44:59
I think this could be a ghostly woman, although the photo is distorted probably because Mr. Scott was altering his shutter speed, but there is quite a difference between the gentlemans figure and the womans. Is she standing behind a wall? because you can't see her feet. I wonder why Mr. Scott took the photo with the man in it, normaly you would wait untill there was no-one else in the photo. Very interesting though.
2

Doris Jones,

Connah's Quay 25/05/2008 10:00:05
Well it certainly looks like a ghost to me. In the enhanced photograph there appears to be a little dog's face in the window next to the 'ghost'. Does anyone agree? Is there a logical explanation for this?
3

magonia,

Wrexham 29/05/2008 20:27:42
I would say that the white streak seems to trace out the path of the man in the picture. It looks like he walked from the toilet (notice the additional white wave, which bobs up and down at head height), and then stopped to stand and look around him. The streak slightly obscures the woman's image, and this too suggests that the trace isn't hers. Her body, head, and smile do not face the camera directly - this implies she is posing for a different photographer (possibly at the same, or another time). More information, i.e. the number of photographs taken, and the length of exposure time, is needed to eliminate the possibility that another photographer (with a friend/partner) was around at the time.
4

magonia,

Wrexham 31/05/2008 14:08:24
What's also interesting is that if the man caused the streak, then the woman must have been appeared in the thin space between him and the wall. She must have appeared in two dimensional form. It's understandable that a (conventional) camera can only render images two dimensionally; but for a figure to appear in flattened form makes it all the more intriguing. It could be argued that she is three dimensional, and that when her picture was taken at that spot the walls were not yet built, thus giving the illusion that she is flatter than normal. However, seeing as her clothing clearly postdates mediaeval fashions, this theory cannot hold.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.